Honorable Public Servants,
I will come to the October 17th workshop if I can. I have to
make a living, so I may not be able to. I will answer Councilor DeYoung's
question about how to enforce property maintenance codes now.
What does active property maintenance enforcement look like?
It isn't a matter of "busting" anyone for a single piece
of litter that has blown onto one's property--or been dropped by a passer-by.
All property codes are enforced with a 10-day written warning first,
followed up on after 10 days have passed. People generally obey
an order from police when it is easy to do so.
Regarding litter, Everett, Washington started enforcement with
businesses in the mid-eighties. A friend of ours found work cleaning
up business properties shortly before I left for Grants Pass.
In Grants Pass, I would make that businesses and vacant buildings
and lots for the first 6 months. During that period, police should
start educating residents when called to their properties, pointing out that,
besides violating city code, property neglect invites trespass, vandalism
and burglary. The city will, of course, train its officers on what weeds
to notice, and get the Courier to inform people about the new enforcement
and education measures, telling residents that they are next.
Old litter, that which is dirty, faded
or slug-eaten, is a particular sign that nobody cares about a
property. So are lots of dirty cobwebs on the house and shrubbery,
and flowering and seeding weeds. (More about weeds later)
So, any sight of litter (old or new), cobwebs or
seeding weeds should bring on an oral warning from police: the property
neglect lecture. Once the city starts enforcing on residences,
five examples of litter or targetted weeds should bring on a written
warning with the 10-day deadline. Police can pass written warnings on
to Community Service for follow-up, and enforcement if necessary. It's
pretty easy to clean up 5 things in 10 minutes, much less 10 days, and those
people would be sensitized pay attention to their property.
Large trash, like the dilapidated couch for which I was
issued a written warning a few months ago, should be issued a
warning on sight as a matter of course, not by complaint. I wouldn't
do away with putting good stuff out for free with a sign, a charming and useful
custom I've seen only in Grants Pass, but obviously broken furniture
should not be tolerated.
"5.12.060 Weeds and Noxious Growth. No owner or person in charge of any
property may permit weeds or other noxious vegetation to grow upon their property.
It is the duty of an owner or person in charge of property to cut down or to
destroy noxious weeds or other vegetation from becoming unsightly, or from
maturing or going to seed, or from becoming a fire hazard. Accumulated waste
vegetation shall be disposed of in a manner so as not to create a fire hazard
or spread vegetation to other properties.
"A noxious weed is a weed that has been designated by an
agricultural authority as one injurious to agriculture or horticulture, natural
habitats or ecosystems, or humans or livestock. They grow aggressively and
multiply quickly without natural controls. They displace desirable plants and
contribute significantly to the spread of wildfire. The State of Oregon has
developed a specific list of plants considered noxious vegetation. (Ord. 2901
§10,1960) (Ord. 15-5641, 2015)" Grants Pass Municipal Code
What kind of weeds should draw the attention of police? Our code forbids noxious, ugly
and/or fire hazard weeds from being allowed to mature, produce seed,
or become a fire hazard. But I would not dream of trying to enforce
against all such weeds at once. Four kinds stand out for immediate
enforcement: fire hazards; sticker seeds and star thistle; windblown
seeds; and standing weeds in pavements.
Fire hazards start with cheat grass, foxtails and heron's
bill, all of which also produce sticker seeds. These should be killed and
removed before they make seed. Other large annual and
biennial weeds, when growing en masse, are tinder as well and must at
least be cut to 2". Owners of vacant lots should be
encouraged to plant good perennial pasture grasses and clovers,
which are far more fire resistant than annual weeds. These can be
cut to 6 inches.
After heron's bill, cheat and foxtails in the spring comes
summertime puncture vine: AKA goat head, bull thorn, caltrops, and my
favorite, tack vine. We have a large lot full on M Street at
Milhouse, and it drapes over the curb at 1080 M, a warehouse for rent, and
on the north side of M just west of the Parkway. It's all over town,
mainly on vacant lots, gravel parking lots, and business properties. Most
residents don't tolerate them on their properties once they know about them,
but there is one on the SW corner of I and Alder who does. He's been told;
he's been reported twice to David Reeves, who is the only person I am allowed
to complain to; the plants are still draping over the corner as they flower and
drop seeds, and smaller plants growing along Alder.
El Nino gave us a break this year, rotting the tack
seeds where water stood on the ground, and causing a fungus in the flowers
of some plants that slowed seed production in early summer.
There are weevils that attack the stems and seeds, sold at
goatheads.com. That large lot on M would be a great host property for
them to multiply and spread out all over town. The city should ask
the landowner to buy weevils instead of spraying twice a year like they've done
for years. But generally, people need to be told to cut them under the
crown, sweep up any seeds that have dropped; and throw plants and seeds into
the trash, not yard waste bins or Southern Oregon Compost. Not that
composting wouldn't kill them, but the seeds that get loose on the way to the
compost piles could be a pain.
When I lived here in the '80s, star thistle was way out of town on
neglected farms. Now it is all over town and spreading. It needs to
be cut near ground level (not 2-6 inches) to kill it, preferably
before its flowers open. Anything that grows back should be cut again,
shorter. It is an annual; it will die when cut below the crown, where the
branching starts.
Windblown seeds make it harder for the neighbors to garden and are
unslightly. People let lawns go dry and die to save on watering and
mowing, but a dead or dormant lawn grows windblown weeds that grow tall
flowers faster than the watered lawn grew grass. (This is one
reason why we need to reform water rates to encourage irrigation.) Police
should warn about flowering false dandelions, mares tails and wild
lettuce, even groundsel in spring, each preferably before their seeds
ripen. This is why our code specifies that weeds must be cut or killed to
prevent them "from becoming mature or going to seed."
Weeds growing in cracks in pavement not only are unsightly, but
are addressed separately in
"5.12.050 Weed, Grass, Snow and Ice Removal A. No owner or person in charge of
property, improved or unimproved, abutting on a public sidewalk or right of way
adjacent to a public sidewalk may permit:...C. Weeds or grass
from growing or remaining on the sidewalk for a period longer than two weeks or
consisting of a length greater than 6 inches."
Start with the standing weeds. The next year, include the
prostrate ones. Clean pavements are critical to making a town look good,
and to keep our storm water clean. Yes, the snow and ice portions should
also be enforced in their season.
Speaking of which, I discovered a code I hadn't seen before,
perhaps because it is not with the other Nuisances:
"5.36.030 Debris on Streets, Sidewalks or any other
Public Way
"A. It shall be prohibited to track, drag, drop, place, cause
or allow to be deposited in any manner any mud, dirt, gravel, rock or other
such debris upon the surface of any street, sidewalk, public way or into any
part of the public storm and surface water system without authorization from
the City of Grants Pass.
"B. No material shall be washed or flushed into any part of
the storm and surface water system, and any such action shall be an additional
violation."
I still don't see anything that requires people to clean leaves
off the street in front of their properties., which would complete the job of
protecting our river water under the code.
Sincerely yours,
Rycke