Asking public servants to ignore the law

Yesterday, I got a call from a person who was totally frustrated with the way the City Council doesn’t listen to her and her neighbors when asked to not allow the Sobering Center and now Foundry Village to be built in their neighborhood. She was also upset that the public were told to not speak about the very reason they were at the meeting, not wanting drunks and homeless people in their neighborhood. She was saying that they never listen, so why should she complain about our water and sewer rates?

Land use hearings always have specific criteria that one can speak to, and outside of that, they cannot rule. They give the rules in the introduction and the applicable criteria in the presentation. That you don’t like the kind of people that use a service in your neighborhood isn’t allowed in the criteria.

Last night, there was a delegation of 8-10 people with a couple of speakers who implored the City and Council to enforce the city code against camping in parks, so regular taxpayers can enjoy them. Several Councilors explained that their hands were tied by state and federal law as well as a court order to allow nightly camping in all parks but the All-Sports Park and are not allowed to evict campers for violations of code or camping rules without 72-hour notice. The city is being sued for criminalizing homelessness with camping bans.

You want the Council to listen to you? Don’t ask them to ignore the law. On the few occasions when they have listened to people who didn’t want certain people in their neighborhood, they have been overruled by the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA).

In the case of campers in the parks, if the City ignores the court, it will be found in contempt of court and likely lose their case. We will probably have to put up with campers in our parks until the city builds sufficient shelters to meet their need.

One Councilor keeps pointing out that little houses, small pallet shelter campgrounds and a warming center will not meet the need and not get campers out of our parks. All of them will also have restrictions on who can use such shelter beyond being peaceful and law-abiding, because they are limited and people in the neighborhood don’t want those without shelter lining up early to get in.

What can meet the need is a couple of large hostels, cheap places to shower and sleep for $5-$10 per night, one for families and one for adults only, to keep kids separated from sex offenders. Think of a building like a grocery store with a large open space where there would be hundreds of cots, 6 feet apart, surrounded by: bathrooms; showers; lockers; a dog kennels; a meeting rooms for classes; a reading/dining room; and a parking lot planted with fruits and vegetables in planting strips, all fenced for use only by its customers. No food service, and few rules: be quiet and peaceful; don’t show anyone your guns or drugs; don’t litter or make a mess around one’s bed. Violators could be temporarily or permanently trespassed or made to pick up litter for minor infractions.

When it comes to asking the Council to reform our water rates to pay all the overhead with base rates and only marginal unit costs with unit rates, they have the power to do so. There is nothing in state or federal law that requires water-rationing rates.

You can ask by email, phone calls, writing on the city Facebook page, in person when you meet them, or a 3-minute comment at City Council meetings, first and third Wednesdays at 6:00. Control your anger; don’t attack them; and speak nicely if you want to influence them. They are public servants, but they are not only your servants. Don’t expect instant action; they need a lot of people contacting them frequently to be convinced to change a rate system that has been in place for over 20 years and to buck what has been instituted in cities around the world over the last 35 years.

Join Friends of the Restwell Center to support hostels and fill out your City survey to support use of ARPA funds to build them. It’s due October 22nd. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1681019735495611

Join Ratepayers for Fair Water and Sewer Pricing on Facebook and contact the council about water and sewer rates every month.

Conjoined Conspiracies, 3-minute commentary

 

            I came to Grants Pass in the fall of 1984.  I left it in the fall of ‘86.  Our utility bill was about $25: $20 for water and $5 for sewer.  It got up to $26 with summer watering.  It seemed like we had thundershowers every weekend of that summer. 

            In the spring of ’86, we were told we were in drought; don’t water lawns or wash cars.  We had 100 days without rain that summer.

            ‘86 was the year that I kept hearing two new memes all through the media: global warming; and conserve fresh water.   I bought them both at the time.

I returned to Grants Pass in ‘99 and became a professional gardener.   My utility bill was about $35 in winter and up to $75 in summer.  The base rate for water was only $12; sewer was $20; water units were the rest.

In 2006, Grants Pass started tiered water pricing with an $8 base rate and much higher unit rates.  My water bill nearly doubled.  My city customers started to let part of their properties go dry. In ‘08, Staff told the City Council that they needed to raise the base rate from $9 to $12 to pay the overhead and “stabilize the rates,” because people had cut back so much on watering.  The Council did, but rates did not stabilize, because people were cutting back more.  High unit rates do that.

In 2013, I did a study of summer temperature and rainfall in Grants Pass over the previous 30 years.  It showed that Grants Pass had lost almost an inch of summer rain per decade.  In the ‘80s, we had bigger rain events in July and August, the middle of the irrigation season, than in June and September.  That reversed in the ‘90s and reversed further in the '00s, when we got tiered rates.  Monthly maximum temperatures took a slight dip in the ‘90s but climbed in the ‘00s.

I began to see the conjoined conspiracies around global warming and rate-rationed water.  Memes didn’t spread that easily before the Internet, but these two ideas were suddenly everywhere.  That took a lot of money and clout in ‘86.  The movement to tax carbon was noisy and controversial; imposing water-rationing rates was quiet and rarely noticed.  Water rationing provided the proof of “global warming,” which became “climate change” after 2000, because dryness creates weather extremes, fires, and floods.

Some very rich investor wanted to rev up wind and solar power and started the ball rolling in 1986.

 

Speech to the Josephine County Commissioners, 8-11-2021, and the Grants Pass City Council, 8-18-2021

 published at GardenGrantsPass.blogspot.com

Like Ratepayers for Fair Water and Sewer Pricing on Facebook

 Rycke Brown, Natural Gardener               541-955-9040         rycke@gardener.com