Remember
the anti-GMO ordinances that both Jackson and Josephine Counties passed? Early
in the process, our state legislature passed a bill, SB 863 (2013), which
forbade local governments to enact or enforce any local measure or ordinance
that would inhibit or prevent the production of agricultural items. Jackson County voters were petitioning their
ordinance for the ballot at the time, so it was exempted from the statute. Josephine County, starting petitions after
the law was passed, was not.
Jackson
County’s GMO ordinance was tested in court recently under the Freedom to Farm
Act, and a judge upheld it, finding that there is no right to grow a crop that
degrades your neighbor’s crop. Hemp
growers and their neighbors should take note.
Josephine
County’s anti-GMO measure has not been enforced nor challenged; it is of no
effect, violating SB 863.
NowGrants Pass City Council intends to ban outdoor growing of marijuana within thecity. They voted for it once on July 1,
with the second reading to be voted on July 15th. Representative Carl Wilson had sent them a
letter by email, warning them that they would risk a lawsuit under SB 863 if
they passed it. They ignored that part
of the letter, and focused on his warnings about the problems that widespread
indoor growing would cause our electrical grid and waste water treatment plant,
some finding reasons there to ban pot growing entirely in the city.
Marijuana
is not a weed in Oregon anymore. It is
an agricultural item, legally grown to be used, and has been since medical
marijuana was passed. It has been a
legal item in commerce since the legislature authorized dispensaries.
Grants
Pass has the authority to inhibit or prevent the growth of weeds under its
nuisance codes. It hasn’t had the
authority to stop or slow the production of agricultural items since SB 863 was
passed.
But we in Josephine County can thank Jackson County for inspiring SB 863 in 2013. A
lawsuit and injunction will be needed to enforce it if the Council passes their
outdoor pot growing ban on July 15th.
Special July 2015 protest issue.
Rycke
Brown, Natural Gardener 541-955-9040 rycke@gardener.com
(3) Subsection (2) of this section does not prohibit a local government from enacting or enforcing a local law or measure to inhibit or prevent the production or use of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed or products of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed on property owned by the local government. [2013 s.s.1 c.4 §3]
Note: Section 4, chapter 4, Oregon Laws 2013 (first special session), provides:
Sec. 4. Section 3 (sic) of this 2013 special session Act [633.738] does not apply to any local measure that was:
(1) Proposed by initiative petition and, on or before January 31, 2013, qualified for placement on the ballot in a county; and (2) Approved by the electors of the county at an election held on May 20, 2014. [2013 s.s.1 c.4 §4]
SB
863 (2013) is ORS 633.738
Courtesy
of Paul Loney, Attorney at Law:
633.738
Prohibition of local laws to inhibit or prevent production or use of
seeds or products of seeds.
(1)
As used in this section:
(a) “Local government” has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.116.
(b) “Nursery seed” means any propagant of nursery stock as defined
in ORS 571.005.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a local government may not enact or enforce a local law or measure, including but not limited to an ordinance, regulation, control area or quarantine, to inhibit or prevent the production or use of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed or products of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed. The prohibition imposed by this subsection includes, but is not limited to, any local laws or measures for regulating the display, distribution, growing, harvesting, labeling, marketing, mixing, notification of use, planting, possession, processing, registration, storage, transportation or use of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed or products of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed.
(a) “Local government” has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.116.
(b) “Nursery seed” means any propagant of nursery stock as defined
in ORS 571.005.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a local government may not enact or enforce a local law or measure, including but not limited to an ordinance, regulation, control area or quarantine, to inhibit or prevent the production or use of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed or products of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed. The prohibition imposed by this subsection includes, but is not limited to, any local laws or measures for regulating the display, distribution, growing, harvesting, labeling, marketing, mixing, notification of use, planting, possession, processing, registration, storage, transportation or use of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed or products of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed.
(3) Subsection (2) of this section does not prohibit a local government from enacting or enforcing a local law or measure to inhibit or prevent the production or use of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed or products of agricultural seed, flower seed, nursery seed or vegetable seed on property owned by the local government. [2013 s.s.1 c.4 §3]
Note: Section 4, chapter 4, Oregon Laws 2013 (first special session), provides:
Sec. 4. Section 3 (sic) of this 2013 special session Act [633.738] does not apply to any local measure that was:
(1) Proposed by initiative petition and, on or before January 31, 2013, qualified for placement on the ballot in a county; and (2) Approved by the electors of the county at an election held on May 20, 2014. [2013 s.s.1 c.4 §4]
Follow @AnRycke on Twitter; GP Gardener on Facebook;
check out GPgardener.com for blogs
Rycke Brown, Natural Gardener 541-955-9040 rycke@gardener.com
I suspect that Section 4 has a typo in referring to section 3 when it actually is supposed to apply to Section 2. I found the same typo online at OregonLaws.org.
I suspect that Section 4 has a typo in referring to section 3 when it actually is supposed to apply to Section 2. I found the same typo online at OregonLaws.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment.